PSG had opportunities to win the match “Before Extra Time”, but Enrique chose not to take unnecessary risks!
Srećko Šijaković PSG Retain the Champions League Crown as Arsenal Fall Short Once Again
Paris Saint-Germain FC successfully defended their UEFA Champions League title by defeating Arsenal on penalties after a 1-1 draw in normal time. The victory confirmed PSG’s dominance in European football and made them only the second club to successfully defend the Champions League crown.
Arsenal were the better side in the first half and deservedly took the lead. However, once the game changed, PSG showed why they are currently the benchmark in European football.
This is what happened, the Final Game plan.
Luis Enrique started with his strongest possible lineup, and PSG struggled during the opening period against Arsenal’s deep defensive setup. Enrique and his players looked uncomfortable, but it also became increasingly clear that Arsenal’s entire game plan revolved around defending.
That approach may work against teams such as Crystal Palace or Burnley, but against a side of PSG’s quality, it was always going to be difficult.
PSG equalised after Khvicha Kvaratskhelia won a foul involving Mosquera, who was surprisingly deployed at right-back by Mikel Arteta. The Arsenal manager’s tactical decisions would become a major talking point throughout the match.
Mikel Arteta’s response was so poor, extremely bad and absolutely out of Luis Enrique’s quality.
After conceding, Arteta substituted Martin Ødegaard and Leandro Trossard. Both players had disappointing performances, but many supporters questioned why Trossard had started in the first place. The match appeared to swing decisively in PSG’s favour when Arteta introduced Noni Madueke instead of Saka despite the score still being level.
Bradley Barcola replaced Kvaratskhelia in PSG and immediately provided fresh energy. Arsenal had devoted so much attention to stopping Kvaratskhelia that Barcola found more space to influence the game.
PSG had opportunities to win the match before extra time, but Enrique chose not to take unnecessary risks.
The game eventually went to penalties.
For Arsenal, Eberechi Eze missed his spot kick after attempting an overly clever finish against goalkeeper Matvey Safonov. For PSG, Nuno Mendes was the only player to miss.
Achraf Hakimi converted his penalty before the decisive moment arrived. Arteta selected Gabriel to take Arsenal’s fifth penalty, but the pressure proved too much. Gabriel missed, PSG celebrated, and the Champions League trophy remained in Paris.
The fact that Arsenal lost a penalty shootout against a goalkeeper such as Safonov raises questions about whether their entire strategy was built around reaching penalties rather than winning the game outright. It reinforced the feeling that Arsenal never truly believed they could beat PSG over 90 minutes.
This result also reopens the debate about Arsenal’s standing in Europe.
Arsenal is far from the second-best club in Europe; it is decided by the draw. Bayern Munich and Atlético Madrid are better teams in Europe and would be tougher opponents for PSG in the finals.
Many observers would argue that FC Bayern Munich, eliminated by PSG in the semi-finals, were a stronger opponent and that the semi-final was effectively the real final. Others would point to Atlético de Madrid as a side better equipped to challenge PSG in a one-off final.
The bigger concern for Arsenal is what happens next.
While supporters are understandably emotional after finally ending their long wait for a Premier League title, the reality is that Arsenal lost a Champions League final in deeply disappointing fashion. Their attacking play was limited, their tactical ambition appeared restricted, and when the game demanded solutions, they had very few.
PSG may have shown Arsenal’s defence too much respect in the first half.
PSG may have shown Arsenal’s defence too much respect in the first half, but beyond that period the French champions controlled proceedings. From an Arsenal perspective, almost every major tactical decision from Arteta appeared to backfire. His substitutions, his game plan- it was wrong.
PSG and Enrique did not choose to risk knowing they would win on penalties if they did not risk conceding the goal. Their decision was penalties as the least risky way of beating Arsenal.
That leaves Arsenal facing an uncomfortable question: what comes next season when we know it will be under Mikel Arteta’s expertise?
Winning the Premier League guarantees him significant credit and support, but football moves quickly. Managers are ultimately judged by the biggest matches, and Arsenal’s performance in this final will not be forgotten anytime soon.
For many critics, Arteta’s management of the final was unacceptable. In their view, it was a tactical disaster from start to finish and one of the poorest performances of his managerial career on the biggest stage.
He showed he does not know anything. Every substitution was a substitute for a man who does not know the concept. After seasons in the Premier League, where he has been doing it, he does it and thinks he knows exactly.
Arne Slot and Liverpool station with Arteta is now Arsenal’s situation!
Here is the situation with Liverpool repeated. Arne Slot has stayed at Liverpool for two years since he won the league and could not be sacked and replaced. He destroyed his team and roster and has lost the finals to Crystal Palace. His team has weakened, and he has been switching two full-backs and has been attempting to sign March Guehy for big money.
Frimpong and Kerkez, instead of Alex Arnold, could not work. But he had ideas and was sacked earlier today by Liverpool. So what am I saying?
I am saying that Arsenal is in the same position, but they have a bigger problem, and that is that Arne Slot is a much better head coach than Mikel Arteta is.
Arsenal are now stuck with Arteta. That is their reality.
Whether that criticism is fair or not, one fact remains: PSG are champions of Europe once again, and Arsenal are left wondering what might have been.
About the Author
